Login
Ratjoy.com » Forums » Suggestions, Technical Support and Feedback » Bug: Had 2 toy stores reduce upgrade amount

Bug: Had 2 toy stores reduce upgrade amount


Timothy Martin
RJ: Empty Inc
CO: Empty

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 29
Karma: 10
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
I recently built 2 toy stores. And started upgrading them to 2000.
But when I checked today for some reason they are now upgrading to 1713.
The other toy stores that are upgrading from 1000 to 2000 are normal though.

This is on EoS.
Andrew Wiggen
RJ: Andrew Wiggen
CO: stessier

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 16
Karma: 48
Joined: Apr 5, 2012
Is it possible you tried to upgrade to 2000 but didn't actually have enough money to cover that size? I've had that happen before - type in the upgrade size and hit the build button, but short on cash and it only builds what you have the money for.
Timothy Martin
RJ: Empty Inc
CO: Empty

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 29
Karma: 10
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
That would be most unlikely though.
Since I upgraded them at the same time.

One would be 2000 now then and the other one less then 1713
Eddie Beahre
RJ: Eddie Beahre
CO: Max

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 12
Karma: 18
Joined: May 6, 2012
did the both start at the same size?
Timothy Martin
RJ: Empty Inc
CO: Empty

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 29
Karma: 10
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
No there were a few hours between the first and second.
Scott (Admin)
RJ: Ratan Joyce
CO: Ratan Joyce

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 1175
Karma: 5083
Joined: Jan 13, 2012
Judging from your current cash, I suspect Tim's earlier comment is correct.

But on checking the DB it shows both stores are at 1713 and are upgrading to 2000.

Oh... your post is from 2 days ago.
Timothy Martin
RJ: Empty Inc
CO: Empty

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 29
Karma: 10
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
I think I know what happened.

I tried to upgrade my two stores from 10 to 2000. Since my other stores were at that level already.

But upgrading to 2000 would take longer then the maximum amount of time taken in one go. (Wasn't it something like 140 hours?)
I'm guessing the limit came to 1713.
So this wasn't a bug after all. My mistake.


You need to register or login to post a reply.